by mayur on | 2025-04-24 20:40:08 1.3K
Here's a blog-style article on Mobile App Security Testing Techniques, written in a clear, informative tone suitable for tech readers or security professionals. Let me know if you'd like it more casual, beginner-friendly, or tailored for a specific audience.
In today's mobile-first world, security is no longer a luxury—it's a necessity. Mobile applications handle everything from personal messages and banking transactions to health data and business operations. With this level of access and sensitivity, mobile apps are prime targets for cyber attackers.
To safeguard users and data, security must be baked into the development process. That’s where mobile app security testing comes in.
In this post, we’ll explore the key techniques used to test the security of mobile apps, how they work, and why they matter.
SAST involves analyzing the app’s source code or compiled code without executing it. This is like checking the blueprint of a building before construction begins.
Finds vulnerabilities early in the SDLC
Detects hardcoded credentials, insecure API keys, weak encryption
Useful in CI/CD pipelines
MobSF, Checkmarx, Fortify, SonarQube
DAST evaluates the app while it is running, typically in a test environment. This technique mimics how a hacker would interact with the app to uncover runtime flaws.
Insecure API calls
Broken authentication or session management
Poor error handling and data exposure
OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, Drozer
Every platform has its own security guidelines. This technique ensures the app follows best practices for iOS and Android, such as:
Secure use of permissions
Proper data storage (e.g., no sensitive data in SharedPreferences or NSUserDefaults)
Encrypted communication
OWASP Mobile Security Testing Guide (MSTG)
Reverse engineering involves decompiling or disassembling the app to view its inner workings.
Hardcoded secrets (e.g., API keys, passwords)
Lack of code obfuscation
Exposure of proprietary algorithms or business logic
JADX, Apktool, Hopper, Ghidra
Mobile pen testing simulates real-world attacks on the app, its APIs, and backend services.
Client-server communication
Local data storage
API security flaws
SSL pinning bypasses
Combine manual testing with automated tools for best results.
Sometimes, you need to go deeper. Tools like Frida or Objection let you hook into running apps, alter function behavior, and inspect real-time data flows.
Bypass authentication
Inspect memory data
Override internal methods
Frida, Xposed Framework, Objection
Mobile apps rely heavily on backend APIs. If these APIs aren’t secure, neither is your app.
Insecure endpoints
Broken authentication
Data leakage via verbose errors
Postman, Burp Suite, Insomnia
Follow the OWASP API Security Top 10
Security isn't just about code—configuration matters too. This technique validates that the app:
Uses HTTPS for all traffic
Sets secure flags on cookies
Implements secure storage & logging
OWASP MASVS (Mobile AppSec Verification Standard)
CIS Benchmarks
Security testing is no longer optional—especially for mobile apps handling sensitive data. By applying a combination of SAST, DAST, pen testing, and platform-specific assessments, developers and security teams can ship safer, more trustworthy apps.
Don’t treat security testing as a one-time event. Make it a continuous part of your DevSecOps workflow.
Leave a Comment